Cookie-Einstellungen
     
 
 
新闻
Endoscopy News: issue 12/2024 is ready! 2024-12-12


Endoscopy

Issue 12 · Volume 56 · December 2024

Green Stamp at Endoscopy

鉴于人们越来越意识到内窥镜手术对环境的影响,Endoscopy决定为解决这一问题和/或提供减少浪费或减少二氧化碳排放方法的稿件颁发“绿色印章”。


Endoscopy 2024年第12期现已上线。欢迎免费阅读本期主编精选的三篇论文。

虽然抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)在治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)方面的疗效已得到证实,但其作用机制尚不清楚。在本期第一篇主编精选论文中,Kuipers等人通过一项针对11例质子泵抑制剂难治性GERD患者的前瞻性队列研究,证实了ARMS的有效性。作者未能明确解释其作用机制,但推测其疗效可能归因于减少了短暂性食管下括约肌松弛(TLESRs)。

内镜超声(EUS)引导下使用塑料或金属支架引流是治疗胰腺周围包裹性坏死(WON)的主要手段。Koduri等人在一项涉及92例患者的单中心随机对照研究中发现,使用双翼金属支架(BFMS)或两个7-Fr塑料支架进行初次引流均可获得相似的临床成功率;然而,使用BFMS所需的再次干预次数更少。

欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)对会员(从4000多名受邀者中回收了506份回复)进行的一项调查显示,当前胃肠内镜中的镇静和监测实践存在很大差异。只有36%的受访者遵循了先前的ESGE镇静指南,而44%的内镜单位没有使用特定的出院标准。这些调查结果强调了ESGE在标准化镇静给药培训、术前和术后监测,以及统一镇静方案和给药方法方面提供指导的必要性。

欢迎阅读本期三篇精选论文及其它全部论文。

Original article

Antireflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy and the mechanism of action

Thijs Kuipers et al.

Background Previous studies suggested that antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective in reducing reflux symptoms and total acid exposure, although the mechanism is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the effect of ARMS on reflux parameters and its mechanism of action.

Antireflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal.jpg


Original article

Biflanged metal stents versus plastic stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis: a randomized controlled trial

Krithi Krishna Koduri et al.

Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) using either plastic or metal stents is the mainstay of WON management. Our single-center randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of biflanged metal stents (BFMSs) and plastic stents for WON drainage.

Biflanged metal stents versus.jpg


Position Statement

Sedation practices in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) survey

Konstantinos Triantafyllou et al.

The provision of moderate sedation for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures is considered the standard of care in most of the world. Endoscopic procedural sedation increases patient compliance, enhances satisfaction for both the patient and the endoscopist, and facilitates procedural safety and effectiveness. Moreover, with the increasing complexity of interventional endoscopic procedures, deeper sedation and even general anesthesia are often required. However, the provision of sedation in GI endoscopy presents several limitations, including prolonged patient recovery times, increased healthcare costs, and greater risks of cardiopulmonary adverse events (AEs). Furthermore, there is ongoing debate regarding who should legitimately be administering endoscopic procedural sedation, particularly propofol and other novel sedative agents. In tandem, there is varied practice in endoscopists’ adherence to guidelines for sedation administration, patients’ pre-procedural risk stratification, and the management of sedation-related AEs. In addition, the provision of training in procedural sedation remains nonstandardized and there is a paucity of data on cost-effective approaches to enhance resource use in relation to sedation practices.


63fa0b531c470.jpg

New Impact Factor: 11.5

在最近发布的2023年度期刊引证报告中,Endoscopy的影响因子达到了历史新高11.5,创下了消化内镜领域期刊的新纪录。

感谢读者对本刊的持续支持,感谢作者在本刊发表高质量的内容,感谢审稿人和编辑团队的辛勤工作和奉献精神。我们比以往任何时候都更加坚定地致力于通过高质量的研究和创新推动胃肠道内窥镜领域的发展。让我们共同期待Endoscopy获得更大的成功。 

欧洲消化内镜学会(ESGE)及其附属学会的官方期刊。

Endoscopy为关于胃肠道内窥镜检查的最新技术和国际发展的重要期刊。在国际编委会的专家指导下,本刊提供高质量的内容,以满足全球内窥镜医师、外科医生、临床医生和研究人员的需求。

Endoscopy每年出版12期,内容包括高质量的综述论文、原创论文、前瞻性研究、有价值的诊断和治疗进展调查、以及对最重要的国内和国际会议进行的深入报道。文章经常辅以在线视频内容。

在Endoscopy上出版的所有论文都经过严格的同行评审。基于在线投稿和快速处理,保证了电子版和印刷版的出版速度。